Sealing and Signing Divisions 00 and 01, Is it Architecture or Engineering?, by Kevin O’Beirne

Should design professionals seal and sign Division 00 documents and Division 01 specifications? In the past, when the architect or engineer prepared all the construction documents and administered the project’s construction alone, it probably did not matter much. In modern times, however, where an owner’s procurement department, a construction manager, or the owner’s program manager may prepare part or all of Divisions 00 and 01, the answers are less clear and more important.

Continue reading

Applicability of statute that prohibits the contractual elimination of tort liability, to a contract clause waiving the right to subrogation. Rural Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lester Buildings, LLC. Supreme Court of Wisconsin (2019), by Hugh Anderson

Applicability of statute that prohibits the contractual elimination of tort liability, to a contract clause waiving the right to subrogation. Rural Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lester Buildings, LLC. Supreme Court of Wisconsin (2019)

Continue reading

Project owner’s liability for delays arising from design review comments that deviated from the contractually-established design process. Appeals of RBC Construction Corp. Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (2020), by Hugh Anderson

Project owner’s liability for delays arising from design review comments that deviated from the contractually-established design process. Appeals of RBC Construction Corp. Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (2020), by Hugh Anderson

Continue reading

Timeliness of construction defect claims—commencement of California’s 10 year statutory repose period. Hensel Phelps Construction Co. v. Superior Court. Court of Appeals of California (2020).by Hugh Anderson

Timeliness of construction defect claims—commencement of California’s 10 year statutory repose period. Hensel Phelps Construction Co. v. Superior Court. Court of Appeals of California (2020).by Hugh Anderson

Continue reading

Contractor Incentives, The Carrot vs. the Stick, by Kevin O’Beirne

A wry, old joke goes, “The beatings will continue until morale improves.” No one enjoys being threatened before doing anything wrong, yet construction contracts do this to contractors all the time. Contract clauses intended to discourage certain actions or outcomes are common. Among these are liquidated damages and penalties for late completion, special (conditional) damages […]

Continue reading

Did the construction contractor encounter a differing site condition? W.M. Schultz Construction Inc. v. Vermont Agency of Transportation. Supreme Court of Vermont (2018), by Hugh Anderson

Summary: W.M. Schultz Construction entered into a contract with the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) to rebuild four highway bridges destroyed by Tropical Storm Irene. Schultz completed three of the bridges without incident. The fourth bridge (referred to as Bridge 19) was a single-span steel-girder bridge over the White River. The east abutment of the […]

Continue reading

Engineer’s duty to warn contractor of dangerous roof conditions. Waltman v. Engineering Plus, Inc. Supreme Court of Mississippi (2019), by Hugh Anderson

Summary: Construction foreman George Waltman was injured when he fell through the roof of a building in Meridian, Mississippi. Waltman was an employee of the general contractor, Norman Enterprises. Waltman claimed the project engineer was aware of the dangerous condition of the roof and failed to warn the workforce of the danger. Lauderdale County had […]

Continue reading

General contractor’s responsibility for safety of subcontractor’s employee. Foley v. Builtech Construction, Inc. Appellate Court of Illinois (2019), by Hugh Anderson

Summary: John Foley was an employee of a subcontractor. He injured his back while pulling rebar from a tangled storage pile. Builtech was the general contractor. Foley sued Builtech, alleging negligence, failure to provide a safe workplace, and premises liability. Builtech moved for summary judgment, contending that it did not have actual or constructive notice […]

Continue reading

Issue: Impact of a pay-when-paid clause in the context of subcontractor’s payment bond claim. Crosno Construction, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America. Court of Appeal, California (2020), by Hugh Anderson

Summary: Clark Bros., Inc., was the general contractor on an arsenic removal water treatment plant project for the North Edwards Water District in Kern County, California. Clark furnished a payment bond issued by Travelers. Clark entered into a subcontract with Crosno Construction under which Crosno was to fabricate, erect, and coat two 250,000-gallon welded steel […]

Continue reading
1 2 3 11